Comparative Credibility Study of Health Sites

A very interesting study by Sliced Bread Design which looks into the differences between how consumers and health experts evaluate the credibility of health sites. The study showed that online consumers and experts diverge greatly in their credibility assessment criteria. Among other conclusions, the study found that "health experts assigned more credibility to health sites that provided information from reputable sources and cited the names and credentials of authors for each article published". The visual appeal of a site's design was far less important to experts than it was to consumers when assessing health site credibility. The top criteria for health experts were:

  • Name reputation of a site, its operator, or that of its affiliates

  • Information source, which relates to the citation of a site's information sources

  • Company motive, which relates to a user's perception of the motive of the organization behind the site, whether good or bad
  • Based on the study results, the report recommends guidelines for designing credible health sites.

    Read abstract and/or download PDF report here.

    Posted by: bond on 04-07, 07:16PM | HCP Marketing | Website Development
    « Older Online Drug Buying Easier To Swallow | New Signs of Life in Today's eHealth Consumer - 5 Critical Trends in 2004 Newer »
    Comments:
    Post a comment:
















    Keep Updated

    Monthly email updates on online pharma marketing.
    separator.gif
    About GreaterRx
    GreaterRx is an industry resource brought to you by the interactive marketing experts at Greater Than One.

    Contact us with questions, comments, or to suggest an article.
    Greater Than One
    separator.gif